Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558275›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

A single-arm phase II trial of

Hana Kim, Joohyun Hong, Sun-Young Kong, Moon Ki Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hana KimCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center 323, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Joohyun HongCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center 323, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Sun-Young KongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center 323, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Moon Ki ChoiCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center 323, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is an unmet need for optimal third- or later-line treatment options for refractory or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This phase II study investigated whether high-dose irinotecan rechallenge based on Methods: Patients who had previously received more than two lines of chemotherapy, including 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and had shown either a partial response or durable response for more than 24 weeks to irinotecan were included. Patients without the defective allele of Results: A total of 32 patients was enrolled between October 2020 and March 2023. The primary endpoint, 12w DCR was 40.6% (13 of 32 patients). The ORR was 15.6% (5 of 32). The median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 13.3) and the median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 3.3). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 19 patients (59.4%). Dose reduction due to adverse events occurred in 9 patients (50.0%) in Conclusion: High-dose irinotecan rechallenge guided by UGT1A1 genotype was feasible and showed meaningful disease control in third-line or later settings for mCRC patients previously responsive to irinotecan.

Indexed as

irinotecan rechallengelater-line cancer treatmentmetastatic colorectal cancerphase IIprecision medicineUGT1A1 genotype

Identifiers

PMID42558275
PMCPMC13437338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.