ReviewJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2026
Novel electrospun drug delivery systems for periodontal and oral mucosal therapy: a systematic review.
Review in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced polymeric drug delivery systems, particularly electrospun nanofibers and mucoadhesive patches, are promising platforms for the local treatment of periodontal and oral mucosal diseases. However, evidence regarding fabrication reproducibility, mucosal interactions, therapeutic efficacy, and stability has not been systematically synthesized. This systematic review evaluated novel polymeric carriers for dental and oral applications, with emphasis on fabrication parameters, drug loading, mucoadhesion, release behavior, immunomodulatory effects, clinical outcomes, and safety. Following PRISMA guidelines and the PICO framework, two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for English-language studies published between 2015 and 2025. Eligible studies investigated novel polymeric carriers, primarily electrospun or composite systems, and reported fabrication parameters, including polymer type, preparation method, and drug loading, along with relevant biological or clinical outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using SYRCLE/OHAT tools for original studies and AMSTAR-2 for review articles. Eight studies (four original research studies and four review articles) met the inclusion criteria. The included studies evaluated polymers, such as PLA/nano-HAP, chitosan/PVA/PCL, and PLLA/PEO, in combination with active agents including doxycycline, neem extract, curcumin, diclofenac sodium, and binahong extract. Electrospinning consistently generated porous, uniform carriers with fiber diameters of approximately 250-500 nm, sustained release ranging from 82% over 8 h to 60-80% over 7 days, mucoadhesive strength up to 0.34 N, immunomodulatory effects reflected by reduced IL-1, TNF-α, and MMP-8 levels, and antibacterial efficacy up to 98%. These systems also maintained mucosa-compatible pH values (6.5-7.0) and showed no evidence of irritation or toxicity. Needleless electrospinning variants further improved scalability. However, heterogeneity in fabrication parameters and moderate overall risk of bias, mainly from review-based evidence, limited direct comparisons across studies. Overall, electrospun nanofibers and mucoadhesive patches demonstrated promising potential as biocompatible platforms for targeted local drug delivery in dentistry, with the capacity to enhance immunomodulatory and antimicrobial effects in periodontitis, aphthous stomatitis, and oral ulcers. Further studies incorporating standardized fabrication validation and long-term stability testing are recommended to support clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.