ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Delusional themes and forensic status in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a machine learning based discriminative study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) are associated with an elevated risk of violent and offending behavior; however, the specific contribution of delusional content remains insufficiently understood. Prior research has yielded inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between particular psychopathological symptoms and delusional themes and criminal behavior. A better understanding of symptom-specific phenomenological differences between forensic psychiatric (FPP) and general psychiatric patients (GPP) may inform clinical assessment in forensic settings. This study therefore aimed to examine whether specific psychopathological symptoms discriminate between FPP and GPP with SSD. Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 740 patients with SSD (370 FPP, 370 GPP) treated at a Swiss university hospital were analyzed. From an initial dataset comprising over 500 variables, 103 symptom-focused variables were selected to isolate psychopathological characteristics. Following preprocessing, the dataset was split into training and validation subsets. After the application of dimension reduction techniques, multiple supervised machine learning algorithms were applied and compared using nested cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A Results: Naïve Bayes achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.81, balanced accuracy = 78.2%), with stable results in the validation sample. Two variables emerged as key discriminators: bizarre delusions (46% in FPP vs. 2% in GPP) and aggressive delusional content (69% vs. 19%). Global symptom severity measures, including PANSS scores, did not contribute to the model. The Conclusion: The qualitative content of delusions - particularly bizarre and aggressive themes - shows substantial discriminative value for forensic status in SSD, beyond overall symptom severity and established comorbid risk factors. These findings highlight the relevance of symptom-specific, cognitive-affective mechanisms in forensic evaluations. Incorporating structured assessment of delusional content may complement existing psychometric approaches in forensic psychiatric evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.