ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2026
Ultrasound-guided lateral pterygoid muscle block as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia for impacted third molar extraction: a two-center retrospective exploratory study.
Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound-guided lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM) block, a single-intramuscular-injection technique originally described for sagittal split ramus osteotomy, may offer a simplified regional analgesic option for dental surgery. However, its application as an adjunct to wound infiltration in impacted third molar extraction has not been reported. Methods: This retrospective two-center exploratory study included 48 consecutive patients who underwent impacted third molar extraction under general anesthesia between September and November 2025. All patients received standardized intraoperative multimodal analgesia (intravenous acetaminophen and dexamethasone) and wound local infiltration; the LPM group (n = 27) additionally received an ultrasound-guided LPM block with 10 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine, whereas the NE group (n = 21) received wound infiltration alone. The primary outcome was the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score at rest 6 h postoperatively. Institutional and extraction-pattern imbalances were addressed using adjusted ordinal logistic regression sensitivity analyses. Results: The median NRS score at rest 6 h postoperatively was lower in the LPM group than in the NE group (0 [0, 2] vs. 3 [1.5, 4.0], P < 0.001). The institution- and extraction-pattern-adjusted ordinal logistic regression preserved the direction of the association (adjusted odds ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.48, P = 0.002). The recorded total volume of wound local anesthetic was similar between the groups (LPM 9.0 ml vs. NE 8.4 ml, P = 0.729). Lower NRS scores were also observed at 2 h and 21:00; differences resolved by the following morning. The median time to first rescue analgesia was 10 h in the LPM group versus 7 h in the NE group (log-rank P = 0.294). No complications directly attributable to the LPM block were documented during the recorded early postoperative observation window. Conclusion: An adjunctive ultrasound-guided LPM block was associated with lower recorded early postoperative pain scores after impacted third molar extraction. These hypothesis-generating findings require confirmation in the ongoing ALPINE randomized controlled trial (jRCT1031250592).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.