Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558206›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2026

Ultrasound-guided lateral pterygoid muscle block as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia for impacted third molar extraction: a two-center retrospective exploratory study.

Keisuke Nakazawa, Shun Hoshino, Ryota Tsukui, Motohiro Muranaka, Yuto Oshizaka, Yoshio Ohyama, Junko Tamari, Noriya Hirose, Hisataka Kitano, Takahiro Suzuki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Keisuke NakazawaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7714-5016
Shun HoshinoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-4911
Ryota TsukuiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6580-557X
Motohiro MuranakaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0678-036X
Yuto OshizakaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3685-8906
Yoshio OhyamaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-2531
Junko TamariDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9188-0577
Noriya HiroseDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6547-4421
Hisataka KitanoDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7356-506X
Takahiro SuzukiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0591-3445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound-guided lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM) block, a single-intramuscular-injection technique originally described for sagittal split ramus osteotomy, may offer a simplified regional analgesic option for dental surgery. However, its application as an adjunct to wound infiltration in impacted third molar extraction has not been reported. Methods: This retrospective two-center exploratory study included 48 consecutive patients who underwent impacted third molar extraction under general anesthesia between September and November 2025. All patients received standardized intraoperative multimodal analgesia (intravenous acetaminophen and dexamethasone) and wound local infiltration; the LPM group (n = 27) additionally received an ultrasound-guided LPM block with 10 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine, whereas the NE group (n = 21) received wound infiltration alone. The primary outcome was the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score at rest 6 h postoperatively. Institutional and extraction-pattern imbalances were addressed using adjusted ordinal logistic regression sensitivity analyses. Results: The median NRS score at rest 6 h postoperatively was lower in the LPM group than in the NE group (0 [0, 2] vs. 3 [1.5, 4.0], P < 0.001). The institution- and extraction-pattern-adjusted ordinal logistic regression preserved the direction of the association (adjusted odds ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.48, P = 0.002). The recorded total volume of wound local anesthetic was similar between the groups (LPM 9.0 ml vs. NE 8.4 ml, P = 0.729). Lower NRS scores were also observed at 2 h and 21:00; differences resolved by the following morning. The median time to first rescue analgesia was 10 h in the LPM group versus 7 h in the NE group (log-rank P = 0.294). No complications directly attributable to the LPM block were documented during the recorded early postoperative observation window. Conclusion: An adjunctive ultrasound-guided LPM block was associated with lower recorded early postoperative pain scores after impacted third molar extraction. These hypothesis-generating findings require confirmation in the ongoing ALPINE randomized controlled trial (jRCT1031250592).

Indexed as

Anesthesia, DentalMolar, ThirdNerve BlockPain, PostoperativePterygoid MusclesUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID42558206
PMCPMC13437195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.