ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026
How can we change behavior to bolster biosecurity? A scoping review and recommendations.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Farmers' perceptions and the associated facilitators and barriers relevant to performing biosecurity and animal health measures have been well studied. Few studies, however, have evaluated interventions aiming at promoting the adoption of biosecurity measures. This scoping review was conducted to identify and evaluate such studies. Interventions were mapped to potentially useful frameworks, with the aim of informing the implementation of future biosecurity interventions. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, structured literature searches supplemented by reference list screening were conducted. Studies were included if their objective was to evaluate interventions aimed at increasing biosecurity at the farm level to protect livestock from infectious disease challenges. Screening, data extraction, mapping, and conflict resolution were conducted by the first author and at least one co-author. Extracted data on intervention design included context, target participants, desired outcomes, program components, evaluation methods, and theoretical frameworks. Interventions were mapped to behavior change wheel categories, including policies, interventions, and sources of behavior according to the COM-B framework. Of 699 records retrieved, 445 were unique. Of these, 263 underwent full-text screening, and 33 met the inclusion criteria and represented 41 distinct studies conducted or published between 2008 and 2024. Eighteen studies were conducted in the United States or the United Kingdom (12 and 6, respectively), and 25 did not reference a specific disease. Major agricultural species (poultry, swine, cattle, and sheep) were represented, with most studies conducted in commercial production systems (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.