Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558185›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026

Challenging the Role of Routine Thromboprophylaxis in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Comparative Study of Aspirin, Enoxaparin, and No Prophylaxis.

Young Uk Park, Jinyoung Jun, Seugyeob Sakong, Myungsub Lee, Young Wook Seo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Young Uk ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3400-497X
Jinyoung JunDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0097-6748
Seugyeob SakongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5373-169X
Myungsub LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4079-4717
Young Wook SeoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8114-3569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common postoperative complication in orthopedic surgery and may result in life-threatening events such as pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). However, evidence on the optimal prophylactic strategy for DVT following foot and ankle surgery remains limited. This study aimed to assess the effect of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery with postoperative immobilization. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 451 patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery followed by short-leg splint immobilization with restricted ankle motion for more than 2 weeks between April 2022 and February 2024. All patients underwent routine screening duplex ultrasonography at 2 weeks postoperatively, regardless of symptom status. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on postoperative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis: no anticoagulation, aspirin (Aspirin Protect, Bayer AG) 100 mg once daily for 14 days, and enoxaparin (a low-molecular-weight heparin; Clexane, Sanofi) 40 mg once daily during hospitalization followed by aspirin after discharge to complete a total of 14 days. The incidence of DVT was compared using the chi-square test, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Of the 451 patients, 73 patients (16.2%) developed DVT. The incidence of DVT was comparable among the 3 groups, with no statistically significant differences observed (no-anticoagulation group: 24 of 147 [16.3%]; aspirin group: 25 of 145 [17.2%]; enoxaparin group: 24 of 159 [15.1%]; Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort, pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin or aspirin was not associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative DVT following foot and ankle surgery with immobilization. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the observational design and short duration of prophylaxis. A uniform anticoagulation strategy may not be appropriate for all patients.

Indexed as

AnkleAnticoagulantsAspirinEnoxaparinFootOrthopedic ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsVenous ThrombosisAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnticoagulantsAspirinEnoxaparinAspirinDeep vein thrombosisEnoxaparinFoot and ankle surgeryThromboprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID42558185
PMCPMC13437156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.