ArticleJournal of medical extended reality2025
Treating Lower Phantom Limb Pain in the Postoperative Acute Care Setting Through a Virtual Reality-Based Graded Motor Imagery Program: A Case Series.
Article in Journal of medical extended reality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Phantom limb pain (PLP) affects over 70% of people with lower limb amputations (LLAs). Graded motor imagery (GMI) is an established nonpharmacological treatment that targets the cortical mechanisms associated with PLP onset and may be the most effective if it is administered shortly following amputation. However, application of GMI in practice is hindered by the need for trained health care professionals to assist with longitudinal administration and by low patient buy-in (i.e., one's understanding of, and motivation to engage in, a treatment modality). To address these barriers, our research team developed a virtual reality (VR) program to facilitate self-administration of GMI. Objectives: The primary objective of the current case series was to assess initial feasibility of using the VR GMI program in the acute postoperative setting by evaluating recruitment trends. The secondary objective was to describe the satisfaction, usability, and tolerability of the VR GMI program after short-term administration. Methods: Patients undergoing LLAs at a single academic tertiary hospital were screened for eligibility and interest, and consenting individuals underwent daily sessions in the VR GMI program. Adverse events (i.e., any instance in which pain or nausea interrupted VR engagement, as indicated by the Numerical Rating Scale) were monitored to evaluate tolerability. A self-report questionnaire assessed satisfaction and usability. Results: Of 52 individuals screened, 41 were not eligible to participate (79%). Five eligible individuals were not interested in participating due to feeling overwhelmed (10%). Six participants were recruited (12%), and four were able to complete the entire intervention before their hospital discharge (8%). Most participants rated the program as easy to understand, enjoyable, and helpful. However, participant scores also indicated the need to improve usability. Only one participant reported an adverse event (i.e., fatigue in phantom limb). Conclusions: These results will directly inform refinement of the VR GMI prototype and related VR research implemented in the postoperative setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.