ArticleBreeding science2026
Facilitating genomic breeding in citrus via reference panel-based whole-genome imputation of low-coverage sequencing-derived genotype data.
Article in Breeding science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The current status of crop improvement using DNA marker technology.Breeding science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO) is advancing "Citrus Breeding 2.0" to produce diverse, high-quality hybrid citrus cultivars more efficiently by integrating genomic prediction, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and pedigree data. Reduced representation sequencing (RRS) methods, such as RAD-Seq, ddRAD-Seq, and GRAS-Di, facilitate large-scale, cost-effective genotyping; however, variable loci hinder cross-platform comparisons, limiting model reuse and GWAS follow-up. Therefore, we developed an Augmented Estimation of Unified Genotype (AEUG) workflow that converts RRS-derived genotypes into a unified set of predefined loci using a whole-genome resequencing reference panel that shares a common haplotype with target populations. Although Beagle-based whole-genome imputation achieved only 61.3-83.6% accuracy, genomic prediction for 17 fruit traits remained virtually unchanged after conversion, demonstrating the robustness of the workflow. The alignment of loci with ancestry informative markers for four pure citrus species also enabled the estimation of the ancestral origin of the trait-associated genomic regions. The AEUG workflow facilitates the integration and reuse of heterogeneous genotype datasets, enhances prediction accuracy, and enables ancestry-informed GWAS interpretation to accelerate citrus genomic breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.