Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558114›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical extended reality2024

Feasibility, Adoption, and Utility of Augmented Reality in Lumbar Puncture Simulation by Medical Students: A Pilot Study.

Korak Sarkar, Jeffrey Coote, Rahim Abdul, Alec Slayden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical extended reality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Korak SarkarOchsner Neurosciences Institute, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-144X
Jeffrey CooteDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Rahim AbdulOchsner Health System, University of Queensland School of Medicine-Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Alec SlaydenOchsner BioDesign, Ochsner Academics, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The acquisition of procedural skills by medical trainees remains challenging, time-consuming, and risky. The use of augmented reality in the clinical setting is increasing because of its growing accessibility and potential to aid medical education and clinical care delivery. Objective: This study investigated the feasibility, adoption, and efficacy of augmented reality (AR)-supported lumbar puncture (LP) simulation for medical student training. Methods: A randomized and controlled approach was used to assess the effect of AR-supported simulation training versus standard simulation training on the number of sticks for successful LP, distance of first puncture from the target, and the time to successful LP. Pre- and post-surveys were used to assess medical student satisfaction with AR-supported LP simulation. Results: Thirty-four third-and fourth-year medical students were equally randomized into a AR-supported or control LP simulation groups. The median number of punctures required for a successful LP was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 2) in the control group and 1 (IQR 2) in the AR group ( Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in the number of sticks, distance from the target, and the time to successful puncture between the AR and control groups. Significant improvements in confidence levels were reported after simulation training via a survey. Although most of this cohort had no previous exposure to AR, the majority expressed willingness and preference to use AR in the procedural simulation. Future studies would benefit from a multisite design for a larger sample, as well as the use of newer AR technologies.

Indexed as

augmented realitymedical educationmedical simulationmixed reality

Identifiers

PMID42558114
PMCPMC13387223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.