Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558084›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical extended reality2024

Comprehensive Assessment of Physiological and Psychological Responses to Virtual Reality Experiences.

Valentin Fauveau, Anastasia K Filimonov, Renata Pyzik, James Murrough, Laurie Keefer, Omer Liran, Brennan Spiegel, Filip K Swirski, Zahi A Fayad, Wolfram C Poller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical extended reality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Valentin FauveauBiomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-0013
Anastasia K FilimonovCardiovascular Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Renata PyzikBiomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
James MurroughDepartment of Psychiatry, Depression and Anxiety Center for Discovery and Treatment, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Laurie KeeferThe Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Omer LiranPsychiatry, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Brennan SpiegelHealth Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4608-6896
Filip K SwirskiCardiovascular Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Zahi A FayadBiomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Wolfram C PollerCardiology Division and Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a technology with huge improvements in the last few years, offering immersive experiences and paving the way for novel applications across various fields. In the medical field, VR is advancing at a notable rate, allowing for new innovations ranging from pain treatment to rehabilitation and showing its potential to reconfigure the brain to modify how our mind perceives our body and environment. The immersive nature of VR can be reflected in people's physiological and psychological responses, making stress management a key focus to obtain potentially transformative effects as a regulatory stress treatment. This pilot study focuses on a comprehensive assessment, both physiologically and psychologically, of the impact of stressful versus relaxing VR experiences. Our exploratory study examines the effectiveness of this emerging technology in manipulating stress levels in a group of 20 healthy volunteers. In a randomized cross-over design, each subject was exposed to both experiences in two independent sessions, during which their physiological signals were continuously measured. Additionally, blood draws and psychological tests were obtained before and after each VR experience. The results show physiological changes consistent with the paradigm of the experience and supported by self-reported psychological scores. Laboratory findings reveal statistical differences in cortisol levels when comparing changes in the Stress versus Relax experience. Additionally, statistically significant changes in white blood cell counts are observed when comparing pre- versus post-Stress VR. These results provide a first attempt to explore how VR scenarios can modulate individual stress levels and the immune response. Future exploratory avenues may include the implementation of VR-based treatments for stress modulation aimed at mitigating the detrimental effects of stress on mental health, cardiovascular disease, and the immune system.

Indexed as

immune systemmedicinephysiological signalspsychological testsstressvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42558084
PMCPMC13387228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.