ArticleJournal of medical extended reality2024
Recall of Psychotherapy Information and Immersiveness in a Virtual Reality Application for Cancer-Related Chronic Pain.
Article in Journal of medical extended reality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is increasing interest in the use of virtual reality (VR) as a modality to provide health interventions to patients. An unmet need in patients with cancer-related chronic pain is the availability of effective nondrug, pain psychology-based therapies that improve function and quality of life. To address this need, we previously created a custom-made VR program that teaches how to self-administer progressive muscle relaxation and guided pain visualization therapy in patients with cancer. We sought to determine if knowledge retrieval of these therapies is affected when comparing the same content delivered via a VR head-mounted display and hand motion controllers ("VR group") or via 2D monitor and keyboard/mouse on a traditional personal computer ("PC Monitor group"). Methods: Randomized controlled study of healthy volunteers divided into VR group and Monitor group. Primary outcome was multiple-choice question scores between groups at two time periods (immediately after use and 2 weeks follow-up) testing knowledge recall of the therapies. Secondary outcomes were levels of immersion and satisfaction. Results: Forty healthy adults were recruited. Participants rated the VR-based version as highly immersive compared with the PC Monitor version ( Conclusion: This study provided further evidence on how to implement VR in clinical settings to improve acceptability and equivalency to traditional methods of chronic pain education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.