Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558079›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical extended reality2024

Reporting on the Acceptance and Usability of a Virtual Reality Visual Rehabilitation Program in Pediatric Patients With Homonymous Hemianopia.

Danielle Tchao, Eduardo Garcia-Giler, Kyle Cheung, Bill Zhang, Inci Yaman Bajin, Mariana Misawa, Monica Daibert-Nido, Eric Bouffet, Michael Reber, Lora Appel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical extended reality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Danielle TchaoOpenLab, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Eduardo Garcia-GilerDepartment of Cell and System Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Kyle CheungDonald K. Johnson Eye Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Bill ZhangLaboratory Medicine Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Inci Yaman BajinDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Mariana MisawaDonald K. Johnson Eye Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Monica Daibert-NidoDonald K. Johnson Eye Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Eric BouffetDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Michael ReberDonald K. Johnson Eye Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Lora AppelOpenLab, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7176-7191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Visual field defects are common in patients with brain tumors. In children, early vision loss can lead to delayed development of motor, language, and social skills, limiting their independence and increasing the risk of depression or anxiety later in life. There is emerging evidence that audio-visual stimulation in the blind field is an effective rehabilitation technique for treating visual field loss. The purpose of this article is to report on feedback from participants in a pilot study that explored virtual reality (VR) as a home-based visual rehabilitation tool for treating hemianopia patients. Subjects/Methods: Ten pediatric patients with homonymous hemianopia (ages 10-17 years) were recruited for the study conducted through Toronto Western Hospital. Participants followed an audio-visual stimulation protocol from home over 4-6 weeks, training their visual perception through an head-mounted display Meta Quest 2 VR headset for 15 min, every other day. Participants completed visual assessments at baseline, postintervention, and at 1- and 6-month follow-ups. A semi-structured interview was conducted postintervention to collect feedback on the participant's experience with the device and the training protocol. Results: This article reports on the data collected through the exit interviews. All participants were able to complete the visual training protocol, and reported few technical difficulties using the system as well as few symptoms of cybersickness. Half of the participants perceived an improvement in their visual perception after completing the intervention. Participants were generally self-motivated to adhere to the therapy, but a common complaint was that the training became repetitive and they lost interest as the weeks progressed. Personalization or gamification of the intervention was recommended by participants for improving engagement.

Indexed as

hemianopia or hemianopsialow-visionpersonalized medicinerehabilitationvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42558079
PMCPMC13387231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.