Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558073›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical extended reality2024

Surgical Multidisciplinary Team Meetings Are Enhanced by Collaboration in the Metaverse.

Rojan Ghaderi, Thomas Edwards, Justin Cobb, Kartik Logishetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical extended reality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rojan GhaderiMSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0119-9302
Thomas EdwardsMSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Justin CobbMSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kartik LogishettyMSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT-Ms) are utilized as a tool for clinical decision-making. Currently, these are in-person or remotely attended via screen-sharing of patients' electronic health records, including clinical findings, numerical data, and two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is an emerging technology that allows multiple care-providers to remotely interact with each other and with patient data in a metaverse-an immersive and collaborative digital environment. An MDT-M held in the metaverse could enhance surgical decision-making. To develop an IVR metaverse for MDT-M and to test its feasibility and efficacy to visualize data and make clinical decisions in the orthopedic trauma setting. Interviews of users attending existing orthopedic trauma MDT-Ms at a regional major trauma center identified strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for a novel metaverse platform. This was iteratively tested for feature development, and 24 simulated cases were curated from previous admissions. Pilot MDT-Ms were conducted, and user experience was measured using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and System Usability Scale. An IVR metaverse platform was developed to conduct MDT-Ms with multiple remote participants. Four MDT-Ms were successfully conducted with health care professionals (

Indexed as

CollaborationMultidisciplinary teamPatient centred careTeamworkVirtual Reality

Identifiers

PMID42558073
PMCPMC13387214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.