ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Building Practice Capacity in Skin Health and Wound Management in Canada: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Two Education Programs in Home and Community Care.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hard-to-heal wounds place a major burden on patients and the Canadian health system, underscoring the need to strengthen workforce capacity in skin health and wound management. This mixed-methods program evaluation examined two education programs implemented in Ontario home and community care: one for regulated interprofessional providers and one for personal care providers. Quantitative data were collected through pre-, mid- and post-program surveys, and qualitative data through open-ended survey responses and focus groups. Between 2022 and 2025, 164 regulated providers and 203 personal care providers graduated. Across both programs, participants reported increased confidence in prevention, assessment, treatment, communication, teamwork and application of best practices. Importantly, confidence was interpreted as a proxy indicator for readiness to change practice rather than a stand-alone endpoint. Survey and focus group findings indicated that participants applied learning in practice through earlier identification of skin concerns, more effective escalation and communication with interprofessional colleagues, increased use of best practices and greater attention to prevention. Confidence gains ranged from 30% to over 50% in the regulated-provider program and 20% to 45% in the personal care provider program. Qualitative findings reinforced the impact of increased confidence in practice and included improved prevention focus, communication and changes in practice. Thus, these programs, by increasing confidence and self-reported changes in practice, enhanced learners' capacity to deliver quality skin health and wound care. Practice capacity was operationalised in this study as a multidimensional construct that includes role-appropriate knowledge, confidence, readiness to apply evidence-informed practices, communication and escalation behaviours and participation. These programs offer a scalable model to enhance wound care capacity and support health-system sustainability in Canada. Economic outcomes, while not formally measured in this work, should be examined in future studies, as the findings reflect a promising approach to cutting the cost curve in skin health and wound care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.