ArticleJournal of medical extended reality2024
Central and Peripheral Attention in Virtual Reality: Test of Visual Efficiency for Concussion Detection.
Article in Journal of medical extended reality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In complex and fast-paced environments, central and peripheral vision are imperative to respond to changes in the environment and ensure personal safety. Measures of vision have become key interests in research exploring biomarkers of concussion. The purpose of this project was to describe differences in performance between individuals with and without an acute concussion on a novel test of peripheral vision delivered through a virtual reality head-mounted device (HMD). Methods: This was a matched case-control study, including 13 participants with and 26 participants without a concussion. The peripheral vision test required visual focus on a center object and use of peripheral vision to identify and select the matching side object with the hand controller. After each selection (i.e., trial), the shapes and colors of all the objects changed and the side objects moved further into the periphery. This was done for 60 trials. Test performance was compared between matched pairs on the following outcomes: number of trials where the eyes remained on the central object (i.e., a valid trial), correctness among valid trials, and mean response time for selection. Effect sizes were used to describe the magnitude of difference between group means. Results: Moderate effects were found, indicating a greater number of valid trials, for the test overall ( Conclusion: This novel test in a virtual reality HMD was able to corroborate findings with previously published studies on this topic. Our results elucidate deficits in functional peripheral vision processing after concussion. This is important when designing rehabilitative programs to target specific deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.