ArticleJournal of medical extended reality2024
Improving Patient Education Using Augmented Reality for Spine Fractures: Feasibility Study and Review of Literature.
Article in Journal of medical extended reality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective feasibility study was to investigate the use of an augmented reality (AR) 3-dimensional (3D) spine fracture model, in an acute inpatient setting on patient education. Methods: Adult patients (18-89 years) with traumatic spine fractures were included (June 2021-July 2022). Standard spine computed tomography imaging obtained during trauma evaluation was used to create 3D spine models through an open-source application and converted to an AR software application. A 3D-spine model was presented to patients by a resident while discussing spinal anatomy, injury, treatment options, and possible complications. Post consultation, patients completed Likert-scale surveys related to the consultation discussion, with scores subsequently tabulated. Additionally, a review of the literature was performed using the search terms [(virtual reality) AND (patient education)] and [(augmented reality) AND (patient education)] up to May 2023. Results: Eight patients (50% female), mean age of 57 years (range, 28-85 years), were included. Injuries comprised four cervical, three thoracic, and one lumbar fracture. Treatment(s) included four operative interventions, three braces, and one observation. Median patient Likert-scale score was 36 (range, 33.75-36; maximum = 36). Highest patient scores were for how helpful the 3D spine model was for learning about specific spine anatomy, injury, treatment plan, and possible complications. Seven articles were identified that investigated patient education using 3D mediums. All studies were in the outpatient setting. Conclusion: AR-based simulation has the potential to improve patient understanding of spinal anatomy, injury, treatment plan, and potential complications over a wide range of traumatic spinal fractures and management plans in the inpatient setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.