ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2026
Manufactured Clinical Risk: Why Better Decisions Matter More Than Faster Investigations.
Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate emergency care depends not only on selecting appropriate investigations and treatments, but also on recognising when they are unnecessary. This article introduces Manufactured Clinical Risk (MCR), a cognitive phenomenon in which non-instrumental information generated by low-utility investigations is reinterpreted as genuine clinical risk and incorporated into subsequent decision making. MCR is proposed as the predictable consequence of relief-based decision making, whereby clinicians seek relief from uncertainty rather than rational assessment of clinical probability. Once established, MCR initiates ambiguity cascades that generate further investigations, referrals, admissions and treatments despite little meaningful change in the patient's underlying probability of disease. This framework provides a plausible explanation for why strategies that accelerate clinical activity do not always produce proportional improvements in emergency department performance. Improving threshold-based decision making may represent an alternative model of performance improvement by safely reducing unnecessary clinical activity before it occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.