ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Silicon dioxide vaginal gel and short-term high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detectability: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05509413 (DEFLAGYN® Vaginal Gel and Spontaneous Remission and Regression of Unclear Cervical Smears and HPV High-risk Infections), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DEFLAGYN® Vaginal Gel and Spontaneous Remission and Regression of Unclear Cervical Smears and HPV High-risk Infections
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntravaginal products, including silicon dioxide-based gels, are marketed to support short-term high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) clearance or loss of detectability, but independent randomized evidence testing these short-term claims against observation is limited. We evaluated whether daily intravaginal silicon dioxide-based gel treatment increases the proportion of women with no detectable cervical hrHPV DNA compared with observation alone. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis prospective, single-center, parallel-group, randomized, open-label controlled trial included women with PCR-confirmed cervical hrHPV infection and no indication for immediate treatment. Participants were randomized 1:1 to 3 months of self-administered daily intravaginal gel treatment or observation alone. The primary outcome was absence of detectable cervical hrHPV DNA by PCR at 3 months. Secondary outcomes during the randomized study period were patient-reported satisfaction and adverse events.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05509413, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05509413.
resultsBetween November 2022 and January 2025, 242 women were randomized, with 121 allocated to each group. Primary-endpoint data were available for 208 women. At 3 months, hrHPV DNA was not detected in 18/99 women (18%) in the gel treatment group and 23/109 women (21%) in the observation group (absolute risk difference -2.9 percentage points, 95% CI -14 to 8; p = 0.60). A reduced post hoc adjusted sensitivity analysis did not materially change the interpretation of the primary comparison. Patient-reported adverse events were more frequent in the gel treatment group than in the observation group (32/99 [32%] vs. 2/106 [2%]; absolute risk difference 30 percentage points, 95% CI 21 to 40; p < 0.001). Satisfaction scores were high in both groups but lower with gel treatment.
conclusionsIn this randomized trial, 3 months of daily intravaginal silicon dioxide-based gel treatment did not improve short-term loss of detectable cervical hrHPV DNA compared with observation alone. The trial did not reproduce the large short-term virologic benefit suggested by prior product-related studies. The findings do not support routine use of this intervention solely to promote short-term hrHPV non-detectability in women without an indication for immediate treatment, particularly given the higher frequency of local adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.