ArticleSmall methods2026
Bridging Materials and Performance in Batteries: The Role of Accurate Models in Electrode Design and Manufacturing.
Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The electrochemical performance of batteries is governed not only by the intrinsic properties of active materials but, more critically, by the architecture of porous electrodes. A key bottleneck is ion diffusion hindered by tortuous pore pathways, which induces significant overpotential that limits high-rate operation. Inefficient electron conduction further exacerbates performance losses. To meet the growing demand for fast-charging capabilities, electrode design must strategically balance material composition and pore structure to enhance both ionic and electronic transport. Yet, identifying the optimal combination remains challenging. Mathematical models offer a powerful and resource-efficient approach to pinpoint critical design parameters and guide optimization. This review examines semi-empirical models and physics-based frameworks rooted in mass transport equations, comparing their principles, applications, strengths, and limitations in electrode design. Furthermore, it organizes electrode models around how they link composition and microstructure to transport, performance, and manufacturing. We further discuss the challenges and future directions for translating model-based insights into mass production, focusing on four key enablers: model accuracy, robust parameter identification, intelligent optimization, and integration with manufacturing processes guided by cross-model synergies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.