ReviewThe International journal of eating disorders2026
An Invited Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Atypical Anorexia Nervosa and Anorexia Nervosa.
Review in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSince the publication of our earlier systematic review (Walsh et al.), a substantial number of additional studies have examined the psychological and physical characteristics of atypical anorexia nervosa (AN) compared with AN and/or healthy controls. The purpose of the current study was to update and expand the prior systematic review and meta-analysis using newly available data.
methodA systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, including studies from the original review as well as studies published after July 17, 2022 (the final search date of the original review). Eligible studies compared clinical characteristics of individuals with atypical AN to those with AN and/or healthy controls. Meta-analyses were performed when at least three studies reported comparable outcome measures.
resultsSixty-four publications met criteria for inclusion. Overall, findings indicate that individuals with atypical AN differ demographically from those with AN and demonstrate greater levels of eating disorder-related psychopathology. Non-eating disorder psychopathology is comparable between groups. Individuals with atypical AN experience many of the physiological complications associated with AN, notably menstrual disturbance and decreased bone mineral density, but less frequently. DISCUSSION: This updated review confirms and extends findings from the original review, demonstrating that individuals with atypical AN experience substantial psychological distress at levels comparable to those of individuals with AN and similar but less frequent physiological disturbances. These findings continue to support the similarities between atypical AN and AN in clinical and research settings, but underscore the need for specific diagnostic criteria for atypical AN and longitudinal studies to clarify illness course and outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.