ReviewJournal of neuroendocrinology2026
Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?
Review in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acromegaly is a rare disease, due in most of the cases to a growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma (PA), namely neuroendocrine tumour (PitNET). The treatment of patients with acromegaly is multimodal and multi-step, including surgery, medical therapies, and radiotherapy. In the last 30 years, the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of acromegaly has progressively increased, and the therapeutic algorithm has been significantly modified through the identification of clinical, biochemical, and molecular biomarkers of treatment outcome. The personalization of acromegaly treatment has shifted the paradigm from a 'trial-and-error' to a 'target-to-treat' treatment approach to achieve early disease control and to reduce the risk of disease-related comorbidities that may lead to an increased mortality. Nevertheless, despite the numerous improvements in the treatment of patients with acromegaly, disease control is not achieved in all patients, according to the results of randomized clinical trials, interventional studies, and prospective and retrospective observational studies. In parallel, the normalization of GH and IGF-I levels may not be sufficient to control acromegaly related symptoms and prevent disease-related comorbidities. In this review, we will report on the most recent aims of treatment and cure in patients with acromegaly, on the efficacy and predictors of response to conventional treatments (such as first- and second-generation somatostatin receptor ligands and growth hormone receptor antagonist). A specific section will focus on the rarer aggressive disease pictures and on the treatment with systemic therapies (such as temozolomide and capecitabine) and on target therapies (such as neo-angiogenesis and immune checkpoint inhibitors).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.