Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42557561›Full record

ArticleThrombosis journal2026

Integrating pulmonary embolism response teams: perspectives and outcomes from a European and German survey analysis.

Lukas Hobohm, Karsten Stannek, Karsten Keller, Ioannis T Farmakis, Tobias Tichelbaecker, Philipp Lurz, Christian Perings, Stavros Konstantinides, Ingo Ahrens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thrombosis journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lukas Hobohm *Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz), City Mainz, Germany. lukas.hobohm@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Karsten Stannek *Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz), City Mainz, Germany.
Karsten KellerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz), City Mainz, Germany.
Ioannis T FarmakisCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), City Mainz, Germany.
Tobias TichelbaeckerClinic III for Internal Medicine, Heart Centre of University Hospital of Cologne, City Cologne, Germany.
Philipp LurzDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz), City Mainz, Germany.
Christian PeringsDepartment of Cardiology, Katholisches Klinikum Luenen, City Luenen, Germany.
Stavros KonstantinidesCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), City Mainz, Germany.
Ingo AhrensDepartment of Cardiology and Medical Intensive Care, Augustinerinnen Hospital, Academic Teaching Hospital University of Cologne, City Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, establishing multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs/EXPERT-PE) has become more prevalent. A survey was conducted to assess the availability and structure of PERTs in German and European hospitals. A survey was circulated among German hospital centers with cardiovascular expertise to obtain data on their current PE treatment approaches, the existence and features of PERTs, their activation methods, and their structural organization. Additionally, data regarding PE treatment priority relative to acute coronary syndrome and the availability of outpatient PE follow-up programs was gathered. Results were compared with those of European PE reference centers. Overall, 65 hospitals participated at this German survey with most PERTs available at university hospitals (63%), especially in West (63%) and Southern (62%). Although 61.5% of the German centers handle over 40 PE cases annually, only 52.3% of those hospitals already implemented a PERT, which is low in comparison to a European Survey among PE reference centers (80.8%). In 86% cases, PERT is led by Cardiology, followed by Angiology (6.9%), Pulmonology (4.6%), and Critical Care Medicine (2.3%). Regarding advanced treatment the majority of hospitals performed catheter-directed thrombolysis (72.2%) and catheter-based thrombectomy/aspiration (74.1%). A follow-up program for patients with PE is considerable higher in European reference centers opposed to German hospitals. This survey demonstrated that among large German cardiovascular centers PERTs are markedly less often present compared to European PE reference centers. Additionally, in German centers, PE follow-up programs are not widely implemented. This emphasizes the pressing need for awareness campaigns for acute and chronic PE.

Indexed as

PERTPulmonary embolismTeam

Identifiers

PMID42557561
PMCPMC13439755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.