ArticleBMC medicine2026
Socioeconomic inequality in recommended childhood vaccinations in Germany: evidence from insurance claims and concentration index decomposition.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite well-established childhood immunization programs in many high-income countries, vaccination series are often delayed or not completed. Gaps in vaccination coverage are more common among children from socioeconomically disadvantaged households, among whom they are associated with higher rates of related hospitalizations. We aimed to assess the extent of these gaps in Germany, as well as the presence of socioeconomic inequality and the factors accounting for it.
methodsUsing health insurance claims data from Techniker Krankenkasse for 2016-2019, we examined vaccination coverage for a comprehensive set of STIKO-recommended childhood vaccinations in six birth-year cohorts (2011-2018; approximately 430,000 children; 2.5 million recommended vaccinations). Coverage was defined as completion of the recommended series with all doses administered within the recommended age window. Socioeconomic inequality was quantified using the Erreygers-corrected concentration index and decomposed into contributions from factors such as parental education and travel time to the treating physician.
resultsApproximately 80% of vaccination series in the sample were complete and administered within the recommended age window. Vaccination coverage showed a small but statistically significant socioeconomic gradient (concentration index = 0.024, 95% confidence interval: 0.023 to 0.025) favoring children from higher socioeconomic households. In the decomposition analysis, provider type accounted for the largest share of this gradient, with lower completion rates and timeliness among children whose outpatient care was mainly delivered by general practitioners compared with pediatricians. Parental education contributed to a lesser extent, and travel time contributed little to the observed inequality.
conclusionsChildhood vaccination coverage in Germany remains below national targets and shows a small socioeconomic gradient. The gradient appears to be less strongly related to logistical access barriers than to differences in how vaccinations are delivered in outpatient care outside pediatric settings. These provider-type differences in vaccination delivery may therefore be more relevant for narrowing the observed gradient than further reductions in travel time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.