ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2026
Ecological features and sozological assessment of Unio crassus in watercourses of the right-bank Ukraine in the context of EU environmental directives implementation.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current status of Unio crassus populations in the watercourses of the right-bank Ukraine was studied. Of 191 localities surveyed, the species was found at 30, across four river basins: the Danube, Dniester and Southern Bug basins and the Prypiat sub-basin. Co-occurrence of U. crassus with other Unionidae was analysed using the Jaccard and Sørensen-Dice indices; the highest values were found with U. pictorum ([Formula: see text] = 0.59) and U. tumidus ([Formula: see text] = 0.52), indicating similar habitat requirements. Comparative assessment of the combined demographic and morphometric indicators distinguished three population groups. The populations of the Ubort (Sushchany) and Stalineshti (Mamalyha) rivers showed the most favourable demographic and morphometric indicators and are regarded as candidate donor populations for species recovery. Morphometric analysis revealed variability in shell size, with the largest shells in the Stalineshti River population (mean shell length [Formula: see text] mm). A comparison of the Prypiat sub-basin between 2007 and 2011 and 2020-2024 indicated an overall decline in occurrence (from 40.6% to 20.0% of sites; Fisher's exact test, [Formula: see text]), including loss of detections in the Noryn River and a reduction in the Ubort River; small, uneven samples and differences in survey effort mean these trends should be interpreted with caution. The results can inform the planning of protected areas, particularly Emerald Network sites, the development of species management plans, and the adaptation of European U. crassus conservation experience to Ukraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.