ArticleMemory & cognition2026
When attention matters: Domain-specific disruption of explicit but not implicit memory in statistical learning.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Statistical learning (SL), defined as the ability to extract regularities in the environment, plays a key role in speech segmentation and language acquisition. An important yet still unresolved question is whether top-down attention influences SL, and if so, whether this depends on domain-specific or domain-general attentional resources. To address this question, participants listened to syllables adhering to a statistical structure (forming trisyllabic "words") under different attentional manipulations. In one (domain-general) condition, participants either engaged with or passively viewed visuospatial stimuli, while in the second (domain-specific) condition, participants engaged with or passively viewed competing linguistic stimuli. SL was assessed using an explicit familiarity-rating task and an implicit reaction-time based syllable detection task. On the explicit measure, participants who engaged in a competing linguistic task performed more poorly than control participants, whereas performance was similar in the two visuospatial conditions, regardless of attentional condition. In contrast, all participants showed comparable and robust performance on the implicit measure of statistical learning. These results suggest that explicit memory for statistical regularities is impaired if, and only if, domain-specific attention is reduced, whereas the implicit expression of SL is robust against reductions in attentional resources of any kind. Moreover, both explicit and implicit performance remained above-chance under conditions of divided attention, even when the concurrent task required linguistic processing. These results have practical implications for language learners, who may be able to extract basic statistical properties of language input while engaging in a concurrent, unrelated task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42557525What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.