ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Artificial intelligence-supported segmentation of cardiac anatomy in open-heart surgery videos.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate identification of anatomical structures is essential for safe congenital cardiac surgery and for the development of assistive robotic systems. However, scalable annotation of open-heart surgical video remains a major challenge due to dynamic tissue motion, occlusion, and anatomical variability. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a human-in-the-loop segmentation and tracking pipeline for congenital open-heart surgery videos. A dataset of 72 annotated video clips comprising 27,461 frames was created from routine recordings of congenital cardiac surgery. Independent tracking evaluation was performed on 6 video clips (2,400 frames) from three surgical cases that were not used for training or validation. A hybrid framework combining fine-tuned Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2) for propagation-based tracking and YOLOv11 for detection-based monitoring was implemented and evaluated. Fine-tuning improved temporal tracking performance compared with the pretrained model, increasing the mean IoU from 82.1% to 92.2% and the proportion of frames with IoU ≥ 90% from 48.2% to 72.3% on the independent evaluation dataset. A graphical user interface enabled efficient dataset creation, reducing annotation time by approximately 40-fold compared with manual tracing. This study demonstrates that domain-adapted foundation-model tracking can provide robust anatomical tracking in a dynamic open surgical environment and offers a scalable framework for future assistive and robotic cardiac applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.