ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Surgeon-authorized natural-language and instrument-tracking shared control for robotic laparoscope holding: the EndoVISTA simulator and porcine feasibility study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stable laparoscopic vision requires a camera that remains steady during fine manipulation yet can be repositioned promptly as the operative target changes. Manual holding can introduce tremor, communication delay and physical interference, whereas keyword spotting (KWS) confines the surgeon to predefined words and repeated low-level commands. We developed EndoVISTA, a surgeon-authorized shared-control framework that combines natural-language commands with instrument-guided coarse camera repositioning on a remote-centre-of-motion laparoscope holder. Chinese expressions are grounded to bounded motion primitives, with speech retaining priority for fine adjustment, stop and override. In noise-controlled trials with ten Chinese-speaking participants, EndoVISTA achieved an 88.0% command-execution success rate at 85 A-weighted decibels (dBA), compared with 76.0% for participant-specific KWS (mean paired difference, 12.0% points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0 to 20.0), supporting robustness under the tested acoustic conditions. In a matched ring-transfer task, shared control shortened completion time by a mean of 40.0 s (95% CI, 25.7 to 54.3), reduced repeated or corrective commands by 17.6 (95% CI, 13.8 to 21.4), and lowered Raw National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index scores by 13.0 points relative to KWS (95% CI, 7.4 to 18.6). In a single porcine workflow observation, 15 repeated or corrective commands were recorded with EndoVISTA and 32 with KWS. Because the systems were used on different anatomical sides in one animal, this observation supports real-workflow feasibility rather than comparative efficacy. Together, the results indicate that task-dependent sharing of camera control can improve interaction efficiency and has the potential to reduce surgeon camera-control burden, warranting validation in larger clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42557482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.