Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42557482›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Surgeon-authorized natural-language and instrument-tracking shared control for robotic laparoscope holding: the EndoVISTA simulator and porcine feasibility study.

Li Qiu, Zhikang Ma, Yongshuai Hao, Yawei Shi, Yuanhao Wen, Jianmin Li, Baiwang Zhu, Jinhua Li, Lizhi Pan, Jianchang Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Li QiuInstitute of Medical Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Zhikang MaInstitute of Medical Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Yongshuai HaoInstitute of Medical Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Yawei ShiInstitute of Medical Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Yuanhao WenInstitute of Medical Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Jianmin LiThe Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Baiwang ZhuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
Jinhua LiInstitute of Medical Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China. lijinhua@tju.edu.cn.
Lizhi PanInstitute of Medical Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China. melzpan@tju.edu.cn.
Jianchang ZhaoInstitute of Medical Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China. zhaojianchang@tju.edu.cn.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China 52525504The Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin 24JCJQJC00090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stable laparoscopic vision requires a camera that remains steady during fine manipulation yet can be repositioned promptly as the operative target changes. Manual holding can introduce tremor, communication delay and physical interference, whereas keyword spotting (KWS) confines the surgeon to predefined words and repeated low-level commands. We developed EndoVISTA, a surgeon-authorized shared-control framework that combines natural-language commands with instrument-guided coarse camera repositioning on a remote-centre-of-motion laparoscope holder. Chinese expressions are grounded to bounded motion primitives, with speech retaining priority for fine adjustment, stop and override. In noise-controlled trials with ten Chinese-speaking participants, EndoVISTA achieved an 88.0% command-execution success rate at 85 A-weighted decibels (dBA), compared with 76.0% for participant-specific KWS (mean paired difference, 12.0% points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0 to 20.0), supporting robustness under the tested acoustic conditions. In a matched ring-transfer task, shared control shortened completion time by a mean of 40.0 s (95% CI, 25.7 to 54.3), reduced repeated or corrective commands by 17.6 (95% CI, 13.8 to 21.4), and lowered Raw National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index scores by 13.0 points relative to KWS (95% CI, 7.4 to 18.6). In a single porcine workflow observation, 15 repeated or corrective commands were recorded with EndoVISTA and 32 with KWS. Because the systems were used on different anatomical sides in one animal, this observation supports real-workflow feasibility rather than comparative efficacy. Together, the results indicate that task-dependent sharing of camera control can improve interaction efficiency and has the potential to reduce surgeon camera-control burden, warranting validation in larger clinical studies.

Indexed as

LaparoscopesLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsAnimalsComputer SimulationFeasibility StudiesHumansSwineHuman–robot interactionInstrument trackingNatural-language interactionRobotic laparoscope holdingShared control

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.