ArticleEnvironmental management2026
An Integrated Approach to Nuclear Risk Governance in Decommissioning with a Major Focus on Stakeholder Risk Philosophies.
Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper addresses how nuclear risk governance can ensure long-term safety, societal trust and ethical responsibility in managing nuclear waste under conditions of uncertainty. This challenge is shaped by increasing policy demands for transparency, sustainability and meaningful public engagement following major nuclear incidents. Existing approaches to risk governance draw on a range of theoretical perspectives, spanning technical, social and ethical domains. However, these are often applied in isolation, resulting in fragmented governance models that fail to capture the full socio-technical complexity of nuclear risk. To address this gap, the study critically synthesises key perspectives, including technical risk-based approaches, social and cultural theories of risk perception, decision and economic models and ethical frameworks concerned with justice and responsibility. The findings show that while each perspective offers valuable insights, none is sufficient on its own to achieve comprehensive governance, understood as an integrated approach that accounts for technical, social, ethical, institutional and uncertainty-related dimensions of risk. In response, the paper develops a pluralistic approach that brings these perspectives together into a coherent framework. This enables more adaptive, inclusive and context-sensitive risk governance. The study contributes a conceptual stakeholder-oriented framework to support policymakers in designing governance systems that are not only technically robust but also socially legitimate and ethically grounded in the context of nuclear waste management and decommissioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.