Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42557468›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

Does time pressure reveal habits? Divergent results from outcome devaluation and response remapping paradigms.

Parnian Rafei, Steph F Suddell, Eike K Buabang, Gonzalo P Urcelay, Claire M Gillan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parnian RafeiTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. rafeip@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-4801
Steph F SuddellTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Eike K BuabangTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Gonzalo P UrcelaySchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Claire M GillanTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. gillancl@tcd.ie.

Funding

European Research Council ERC-H2020-HABIT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habits are central to daily life but remain difficult to study in the lab. Outcome Devaluation is often considered a "gold standard" paradigm for habit measurement; yet human studies have produced mixed evidence: many fail to show the overtraining effects on devaluation sensitivity expected from a robust habit index. An alternative measure involves remapping stimuli to new responses rather than devaluing outcomes. Crucially, this procedure limits preparation time to reveal habits that may otherwise be masked by goal-directed processes. Although promising, it remains unclear whether these tasks assess the same behavioural phenomenon. To address this, we compared Outcome Devaluation and Response Remapping under matched preparation-time constraints after 6 days of training. Response Remapping showed the expected pattern: expression of the pretrained (putatively "habitual") response was greatest at 200-500 ms and weakened as preparation time increased. In Outcome Devaluation, raw responses to devalued outcomes increased with preparation time, driven by a time-dependent withholding bias. Once controlled for, devalued responses decreased with preparation time. Crucially, this effect was larger in Remapping. Moreover, task comprehension problems may limit interpretation of the Devaluation task. These findings suggest that paradigms engage partially distinct processes-response inhibition versus automatic action selection-with one requiring inhibition of a learned response and the other relying on fast, automatic actions. Our findings reveal that behaviour on these tasks is sensitive to task structure, underscore the need to consider distinct cognitive and motivational factors driving action selection, and highlight that what researchers call "habits" is influenced by multiple processes.

Indexed as

HabitsInhibition, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeTime FactorsTime PressureYoung AdultAction slipGoal-directed controlHabitsInstrumental learningOutcome devaluationResponse remappingStimulus-response associations

Identifiers

PMID42557468
PMCPMC13615044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.