ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Does the choice of inspiratory muscle training modality affect respiratory and peripheral muscle function in chronic kidney disease?
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selecting an inspiratory muscle training modality for patients with chronic kidney disease: methodological considerations regarding respiratory and peripheral muscle outcomes.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Respiratory muscle outcomes after inspiratory muscle training in chronic kidney disease.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChronic kidney disease (CKD) can impair respiratory, muscle, and functional capacity. This randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of fundamental and functional inspiratory muscle training (IMT) delivered via telerehabilitation in patients with non-dialysis CKD.
methodsSixty patients were randomized to fundamental IMT, functional IMT, or control groups. Thirty-eight participants completed the study and were analyzed: fundamental IMT (n = 13), functional IMT (n = 13), and control (n = 12). Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), strength index (S-Index), peak inspiratory flow (PIF), respiratory muscle endurance, diaphragmatic thickness and mobility, quadriceps muscle strength (QMS) and hand grip strength (HGS), trunk muscle endurance (partial sit-ups, prone, side, and pelvic bridge tests) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were assessed before and after 10 weeks.
resultsCompared with the control group, both intervention groups showed significant increases in MIP, MEP, S-Index, PIF, diaphragmatic mobility, QMS, HGS, trunk muscle endurance, and 6MWT distance (p < 0.05). Functional IMT resulted in greater improvements than fundamental IMT in respiratory muscle endurance, peripheral muscle strength, and trunk muscle function. Although 6MWT distance increased numerically more in the functional IMT group, the difference between the two IMT groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
conclusionFunctional IMT delivered via telerehabilitation may provide additional benefits over fundamental IMT for inspiratory muscle endurance and musculoskeletal function in patients with non-dialysis CKD. Both IMT modalities improved functional capacity compared with control. These findings support the potential integration of functional IMT into telerehabilitation-based rehabilitation programs for CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42557424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.