ArticleScientific reports2026
Unsupervised dietary-behavioral profiling identifies PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) and metal exposure patterns in Korean adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beyond "what and how much you eat," modern nutritional epidemiology is paying attention to how dietary and behavioral patterns, which combine food selection and the context of cooking, packaging, and ingestion, organize health and environmental exposure. This cross-sectional secondary analysis used adult data from the 4th Korea National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS Cycle 4, 2018-2020; n = 4239). Multi-question variables related to diet, cooking, packaging, and ingestion behaviors were mapped into a latent space through unsupervised learning, clusters were derived, and the exposure levels of PFAS, bisphenols, urinary cadmium, and blood lead biomarkers were compared by cluster. As a result, serum PFAS concentrations were higher in the "basic diet/seafood propensity" cluster, with weighted geometric means ranging from 10.998 to 21.767 µg/L for PFOS and from 5.082 to 8.323 µg/L for PFOA across clusters. In the "packaging/contact propensity" cluster, higher PFOA was observed in the adjusted analysis, while blood lead showed an elevated direction but was not robust after FDR correction. On the other hand, the differences between clusters for bisphenols and urinary cadmium were not robust when considering covariates and multiple comparisons, suggesting the possibility that the variability of single urine measurements, uncertainty in exposure assessment, and complexity of indicator characteristics may have affected the results. This study provides an empirical basis for identifying population-level dietary-behavioral exposure profiles and informing targeted risk communication by showing how lifestyle-based dietary and behavioral structures are associated with environmental exposure patterns before directly linking dietary patterns with diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.