ArticleScientific reports2026
No association of childhood maltreatment experiences and attention to facial emotions in men.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A recent study investigated the relationship between childhood trauma and attention to emotions as a function of type and severity of maltreatment in a sample of women. It was found that high levels of physical and emotional abuse severity were associated with a diminished attentional preference for happy faces. Given that men exhibit distinct patterns of childhood maltreatment and often show lower accuracy and attention toward facial emotions compared to women, investigating these relationships specifically in male populations is warranted. In the present study, we examined the relationship between childhood trauma and attention to emotions in a sample of men. Gaze behavior of 98 men with a history of childhood trauma was analyzed in a free-viewing task. Pairs of faces with an emotional (happy, surprised, angry, disgusted, fearful, and sad) and a neutral face were shown for 5 s. An attentional bias score was calculated by subtracting the total fixation duration on the neutral face from that on the emotional face. To assess childhood maltreatment experiences, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire was employed. Linear mixed models were used to investigate research questions. The attentional bias scores exhibited high reliability. For all emotion categories, participants looked longer at the emotional compared to the neutral face. The highest attentional preference was found for happy faces. Results indicated neither a significant main effect of childhood maltreatment type, nor a significant interaction effect between childhood maltreatment type and emotion category. Similarly, no main effect or interaction involving overall childhood maltreatment severity was found. The present findings reveal no significant relationship between childhood experiences of maltreatment (including emotional, sexual, and physical abuse, as well as emotional neglect) and visual attention to facial emotions in men. Our data do not support the hypothesis that early life trauma may lead to alterations in attentional processing of emotional facial expressions in men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.