ArticleScientific reports2026
COOT-CNN: joint architecture and training-strategy optimization for binary colorectal histology patch classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal histology classification remains challenging because subtle morphological differences, staining variability, and inappropriate model configurations can reduce generalization. This study proposes COOT-CNN, a lightweight convolutional neural network in which architectural design and training strategy are optimized jointly through the COOT metaheuristic. The search process considers network depth, convolution type, kernel size, feature width, squeeze-and-excitation attention, activation functions, pooling, regularization, loss formulation, learning-rate scheduling, data augmentation, exponential moving average, and mixed-precision training. The selected configuration is retrained independently and evaluated using accuracy, balanced accuracy, macro-F1, ROC-AUC, precision-recall analysis, confidence intervals, and paired statistical testing. Same-split comparisons are conducted against ResNet-50, EfficientNet-B0, and Swin-T under a consistent experimental protocol. COOT-CNN achieved 96.72% test accuracy and 96.71% macro-F1, while providing statistically significant improvements over the evaluated baselines. The optimized model also maintained a compact computational profile, with fewer parameters and lower inference latency than the comparison networks. These findings demonstrate that jointly optimizing architecture and training components can produce an accurate, efficient, and stable model for binary colorectal histology patch classification. The proposed framework should be regarded as a methodological proof-of-concept, with external, patient-level, and whole-slide validation required before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.