Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42557292›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Biobehavioral synchrony between three to four months old infants and psychologically healthy mothers during the face-to-face still-face paradigm.

Lea Woelflein, I Brenner, J Koenig, I Böhm, M Eckstein, B Ditzen, N Nonnenmacher, C F J Woll-Weber, M Müller, H Christiansen and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Lea WoelfleinFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Chair of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Str. 46, Dresden, Germany. lea.woelflein@tu-dresden.de.ORCID 0009-0005-5697-2399
I BrennerFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Chair of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Str. 46, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-7300-784X
J KoenigFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1009-9625
I BöhmFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Chair of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Str. 46, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9576-5396
M EcksteinInstitute of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1846-4992
B DitzenInstitute of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5853-4572
N NonnenmacherInstitute of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0837-2648
C F J Woll-WeberClinical Psychology of Childhood and Adolescence, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0352-4796
M MüllerClinical Psychology of Childhood and Adolescence, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8431-540X
H ChristiansenDeutsches Zentrum für Psychische Gesundheit (DZPG), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8104-0711
C SchwenckDepartment of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Gießen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1668-246X
R SteinmayrDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0294-1045
L WirthweinDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6589-2634
M KieserInstitute of Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2402-4333
K OttoDepartment of Social Psychology, Business and Methods, Faculty of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5737-2575
C Reck *Clinical Psychology of Childhood and Adolescence, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0759-1563
A-L Zietlow *Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Chair of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Str. 46, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7278-5711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human social interaction emerges through coordinated behavior, emotion, and physiology. Biobehavioral synchrony supports stress regulation, attachment, and socio-emotional development, yet its manifestation in psychologically healthy mother-infant dyads remains poorly understood. In particular, little is known about how behavioral and physiological modalities interact and how synchrony varies across contexts. To address this, 94 mother-infant dyads with 3-4-months-old infants participated in the Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm while cardiac activity was recorded simultaneously in mothers and infants. Physiological synchrony was quantified using cross-correlations of heart rhythm and heart rate variability (HRV) time series, averaged in 10-second windows. We coded behavioral synchrony and assessed bonding via maternal self-report. Behavioral synchrony was higher during play but declined after the stressor, while physiological synchrony was primarily evident during play and lagged 10 s, with maternal responses following infant signals. Low behavioral synchrony corresponded to stronger negative physiological synchrony, indicating that physiological co-regulation persisted despite behavioral misalignment. Supporting theories of early co-regulation, higher behavioral synchrony was linked to fewer bonding difficulties. These findings suggest that low-risk mothers show coordinated physiological fluctuations with their infants, highlighting maternal responsiveness as a key co-regulatory mechanism, providing a framework to identify atypical parent-infant dynamics and guiding parenting interventions that support child development.

Indexed as

Mother-Child RelationsMothersAdultEmotionsFemaleHeart RateHumansInfantMaleObject AttachmentBiobehavioral synchronyHeart rate variabilityMaternal bondingMother-infant interactionPhysiological synchronyStill-Face paradigm

Identifiers

PMID42557292
PMCPMC13443841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.