ArticleScientific reports2026
Biobehavioral synchrony between three to four months old infants and psychologically healthy mothers during the face-to-face still-face paradigm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human social interaction emerges through coordinated behavior, emotion, and physiology. Biobehavioral synchrony supports stress regulation, attachment, and socio-emotional development, yet its manifestation in psychologically healthy mother-infant dyads remains poorly understood. In particular, little is known about how behavioral and physiological modalities interact and how synchrony varies across contexts. To address this, 94 mother-infant dyads with 3-4-months-old infants participated in the Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm while cardiac activity was recorded simultaneously in mothers and infants. Physiological synchrony was quantified using cross-correlations of heart rhythm and heart rate variability (HRV) time series, averaged in 10-second windows. We coded behavioral synchrony and assessed bonding via maternal self-report. Behavioral synchrony was higher during play but declined after the stressor, while physiological synchrony was primarily evident during play and lagged 10 s, with maternal responses following infant signals. Low behavioral synchrony corresponded to stronger negative physiological synchrony, indicating that physiological co-regulation persisted despite behavioral misalignment. Supporting theories of early co-regulation, higher behavioral synchrony was linked to fewer bonding difficulties. These findings suggest that low-risk mothers show coordinated physiological fluctuations with their infants, highlighting maternal responsiveness as a key co-regulatory mechanism, providing a framework to identify atypical parent-infant dynamics and guiding parenting interventions that support child development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.