ArticleScientific reports2026
Diatomaceous earth as physical control agent for root-knot nematode.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated diatomaceous earth (DE), a naturally occurring mineral composed primarily of amorphous silicon dioxide (SiO₂), as a physical control agent against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica infecting eggplant (Solanum melongena). Under laboratory conditions, DE was tested against second-stage juveniles (J2) at different concentrations. Among the concentrations of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g/L, mortality rates of 100% were observed at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 2.0 g/L, while 85% mortality was recorded at the lowest concentration (0.01 g/L). In greenhouse conditions, DE was applied at concentrations of 0.05, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g/L using three application methods: root dipping and foliar spray at inoculation time, and soil drench at three distinct time points relative to nematode inoculation. All treatments significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced nematode infection parameters in a concentration-dependent manner. Root dipping at 2.0 g/L resulted in reductions of 92% (galls), 93% (egg masses), and 92% (adult females). Soil drench applied at the time of inoculation produced reductions of 86%, 85%, and 85% for the same parameters, respectively; while foliar spray resulted in reductions of 73%, 68%, and 73%. Among the application methods, soil drench consistently produced the greatest suppression of J2 populations. In addition to nematode control, DE application was associated with increased plant growth parameters. Soil drench applied one week after inoculation increased root dry weight by 178% at 0.5 g/L and by 185% at 2.0 g/L. These results indicate that DE has potential as a physical control agent against M. javanica infecting eggplant and may warrant further investigation for integration into nematode management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.