ArticleScientific reports2026
Task geometry alignment enables parameter independent and accurate genomic search.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard sequence alignment models biological homology through the metric space of edit distance. While effective for global orthology, this rigid geometric assumption struggles with discrete biological realities-such as insertions/deletions (indels) and fragment-to-reference asymmetry-forcing a reliance on heuristic gap penalties. To address this, we propose Task-Geometry Alignment (TGA), a design principle that structurally aligns algorithmic representation with the intrinsic geometry of the biological task. We implement TGA in TGALIGN, an expert-parameter-independent tool that tiles reference databases to match query lengths, encodes sequences into gap-robust syncmer profiles, and indexes them for high-speed Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) search. Benchmarking against leading aligners (USEARCH, VSEARCH, MMseqs2) demonstrates performance strictly bounded by biological architecture. On standard substitution-heavy markers (COI), TGAlign achieves statistical parity with the state-of-the-art. Conversely, on sequence fragments and indel-heavy markers, TGAlign yields statistically significant accuracy improvements (up to 10% on 16S) while matching the peak performance of MMseqs2 on highly variable ITS datasets. By translating sequence comparison into dense matrix operations via ANN indexing, the current implementation maintains sub-millisecond query latency-an order-of-magnitude reduction over traditional aligners-providing a robust and scalable framework for post-alignment genomic search. Source code is available at https://github.com/JustinBooneLab/TGAlign and datasets are archived at Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17973054).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.