ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel hybrid transformer-based framework (H-ConvNeXt-Swin) to classify brain tumors using MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces a hybrid deep learning model combining ConvNeXt and Swin Transformer for classifying brain tumors from MRI scans. The ConvNeXt backbone is employed to obtain detailed local spatial features, whereas the Swin Transformer identifies hierarchical long-range dependencies, facilitating complementary feature representation. The proposed model is evaluated on a combined public MRI dataset of 7,023 images distributed across four categories: glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and no tumor. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed hybrid architecture outperforms several state-of-the-art convolutional and transformer-based models, achieving an accuracy of 95.37% with competitive precision and F-score. Additionally, qualitative explainability assessment using attention-based visualization techniques offers insight into the model's decision-making by highlighting diagnostically significant regions. Furthermore, we evaluate the proposed H-ConvNeXt-Swin model on the unified dataset and also report source-stratified performance on each of the three constituent datasets: Figshare, SARTAJ, and Br35H. Future work will focus on validating the proposed framework on multi-center clinical datasets and extending it to more complex tasks such as tumor localization and segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.