ArticleScientific data2026
Global Bias-Corrected CORDEX Dataset at Quarter Degree Resolution.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-resolution, bias-corrected climate data from the Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) are essential for regional climate analysis and impact assessments. However, several existing products often rely on inconsistent adjustment methods, heterogeneous observational references, and limited spatial coverage, which hampers comparability across regions. To address this gap, we introduce GloBCORD-QD, a quasi-global dataset at 0.25° (~25 km) resolution covering the historical period (1979-2005) and future projections (2006-2099) under RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 scenarios. The dataset is generated by applying the trend-preserving ISIMIP3BASD quantile mapping approach to dynamically downscaled CORDEX-CORE simulations from four Earth System Models, using CHELSA-W5E5 as a unified observational reference across five key climate variables. Comprehensive validation demonstrates that GloBCORD-QD reduces systematic biases, increases distributional performance (Perkins Skill Score increasing from 0.66 to 0.97), and preserves climate change signals across variables, regions, and scenarios. The dataset integrates multiple CORDEX domains into a consistent quasi-global framework, enabling robust spatial comparisons while maintaining regional detail. By spanning a range of climate sensitivities across multiple models and providing methodologically consistent, high-resolution coverage, GloBCORD-QD can supports robust and comparable climate impact assessments across various regions and sectors, contributing to improved uncertainty quantification and evidence-based climate adaptation and policy development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.