ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Quality improvement in emergency units in low resource settings: a qualitative assessment for understanding challenges and delivering solutions.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators for quality improvement (QI) in emergency units (EUs) in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) and to understand the prioritisation of care quality domains to inform the development of EU-specific guidance for QI across all World Health Organisation (WHO quality domains for LMICs.
methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with specialist emergency physicians from LMICs and convened a workshop with global technical experts in emergency care. A structured topic guide was used for the IDIs. Interviews were conducted virtually, transcribed and thematically analysed using the WHO quality domains and the WHO Health Systems Framework. Data collection and analysis continued until saturation was reached. The 2-day workshop included presentations, discussions and interactive ranking exercises to assess measurements for QI and prioritise WHO quality domains for guidance development. Findings from both components were synthesised to generate key insights.
findingsEleven IDIs were conducted and 26 experts participated at the workshop. QI efforts in LMIC EUs primarily focused on quality domains of effectiveness, timeliness, safety and occasionally patient-centredness. Key barriers to QI included high patient turnover, a lack of skilled staff, limited funds and resources and prioritising patient care quantity over quality. Facilitators included the availability of QI guidance, training, initiating small-scale projects, enhancing documentation and communication and supportive hospital management. Safety and effectiveness were considered the most feasible domains for QI, although all domains were considered important. Variability in how participants defined these domains highlighted the need for clear guidance on definitions, their relative importance and appropriate measures for each.
conclusionsEUs are complex, high-pressure environments managing time-critical health conditions and require development of specific tools and guidance for QI. Addressing the barriers and leveraging facilitators identified in this study can inform the development of effective QI strategies for LMIC EUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.