Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42556526›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2026

Evaluation of venous anatomy after treatment with an intraluminal tissue debulking system in a porcine model.

William Marston, Eric Dooley, Abha Chinubhai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William MarstonDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: William_marston@med.unc.edu.
Eric DooleyIntervene, Inc.
Abha ChinubhaiIntervene, Inc.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidual venous obstruction and in-stent restenosis are common and challenging complications that may occur after interventional procedures performed for acute deep vein thrombosis or chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction. A novel fully integrated thrombectomy system [Recana Thrombectomy Device (RTD)] was designed to treat (in-stent restenosis) and native vessel obstructions. The system includes a debulking catheter, collection baskets, and a family of sheaths. This report describes its use in animal models of native and stented veins to assess safety compared with currently available thrombectomy devices.

methodsThe RTD was studied in comparison to two currently marketed thrombectomy devices, the Argon CLEANER 15 (CLEANER; Argon Medical Devices Inc.) and the Inari ClotTriever (ClotTriever Catheter; Inari Medical, Inc.). Devices were studied in a porcine iliac vein model used in a manner consistent with good laboratory practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies. A total of 26 iliac veins in 13 animals were studied to evaluate performance in normal veins (9 animals, 18 iliac veins) and in four animals with eight iliac veins pretreated with iliac stents implanted 21 days before device treatment. Twelve normal iliac veins were treated with the RTD, four normal veins were treated with CLEANER, and two with the ClotTriever. Five prestented iliac veins were treated with the RTD, and three prestented veins were treated with the CLEANER. Procedures were completed under fluoroscopic and intravascular ultrasound guidance. For each model, both iliac veins were treated with 10 passes of the test or control thrombectomy device through the length of the common and external iliac veins. Survival and sacrifice periods were completed at varied time points to evaluate peak histological injury potential, vein wall healing, and vein patency. Necropsy was performed at 5 ± 2 or 30 ± 2 days after catheter intervention for gross evaluation of the iliac veins and other related tissues. Histology was performed on representative sections of treated iliac veins to evaluate wall damage, thrombosis, or other effects of intervention.

resultsAll animals survived to their designated end points with no unexpected mortality. One common femoral vein access complication led to unilateral perivenous hematoma and thrombosis. Another animal showed postintervention venous constriction with eventual vessel occlusion. All other iliac veins (n = 24) remained patent without significant stenosis at necropsy. No clinically relevant lacerations, perforations, or hemorrhagic events were observed with either the Test or Control devices. Histology revealed intimal disruption and inflammation with all devices, more pronounced with the RTD compared with CLEANER but similar to those seen after use of the ClotTriever. Mild perivenous bruising occurred in some Test device cases, without evidence of transmural bleeding.

conclusionsIn an in vivo model of stented and native iliac veins, a novel venous tissue debulking system was able to engage intraluminal material without serious injury. Vein wall trauma was comparable to a commonly used mechanical thrombectomy device, with no transmural lacerations or device-related hemorrhage. These findings support continued development toward initial clinical trials in patients with venous obstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This experimental study utilizes a porcine model for examination of a novel venous thrombectomy device in normal and stented iliac veins. The study examines the degree of injury occurring within the vein wall in normal and stented iliac veins after treatment with the test device compared with currently marketed thrombectomy devices. The feasibility of removal of the material causing in-stent restenosis is established using the Test device. The study also provides key information on the response of the iliac vein wall in this model to intraluminal devices that impact the wall during treatment.

Indexed as

Iliac veinIn-stent stenosisVenous stentVenous thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID42556526
PMCPMC13631905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.