ArticleCell reports. Medicine2026
An autonomous multimodal AI agent for evidence-grounded ophthalmic diagnosis.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimodal ophthalmic diagnosis requires integrating fundus photography, B-scan ultrasonography, and medical evidence, yet most artificial intelligence (AI) systems remain single-task or weakly grounded. AgentEYE is an auditable multimodal agent that routes ocular images to specialized fundus and B-scan tools, retrieves guideline/web evidence, and synthesizes evidence-grounded reports. In a 302-case internal benchmark, AgentEYE shows higher diagnostic correctness and completeness than large language model (LLM)-only baselines and an ablation without specialized imaging tools; performance remains similar to the no-retrieval ablation, indicating that retrieval mainly supports evidence grounding and citation auditability. Blinded evaluation of 200 cases by three ophthalmologists confirms improved diagnostic correctness, completeness, safety, and citation grounding versus an LLM-only self-citation baseline. External analyses show distribution-dependent performance. These findings support AgentEYE as a traceable decision-support prototype requiring prospective multicenter validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.