Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42555957›Full record

ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2026

Antibacterial Activity of α-Sulfamidophosphonate Derivatives and Their In Silico Assessment as Dihydropteroate Synthase Binders.

Racha Ghodbane, Assia Mairi, Hacene K'tir, Abdelaziz Touati, Zahia Kabouche, Dounia Beldjezzia, Nour-Eddine Aouf, Houssem Boulebd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Racha GhodbaneLaboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry (LCOA), Bio-Organic Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Badji Mokhtar-Annaba University, Annaba, Algeria.
Assia MairiLaboratoire D'écologie Microbienne, Faculté Des Sciences de La Nature et De La Vie, Université De Bejaia, Bejaia, Algeria.
Hacene K'tirFaculty of Medical Sciences, Badji Mokhtar-Annaba University, Annaba, Algeria.
Abdelaziz TouatiLaboratoire D'écologie Microbienne, Faculté Des Sciences de La Nature et De La Vie, Université De Bejaia, Bejaia, Algeria.
Zahia KaboucheLaboratoire D'obtention De Substances Thérapeutiques (LOST), Campus Chaabet-Ersas, Université Des Frères Mentouri-Constantine 1, Constantine, Algeria.
Dounia BeldjezziaLaboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry (LCOA), Bio-Organic Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Badji Mokhtar-Annaba University, Annaba, Algeria.
Nour-Eddine AoufLaboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry (LCOA), Bio-Organic Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Badji Mokhtar-Annaba University, Annaba, Algeria.
Houssem BoulebdLaboratory of Synthesis of Molecules with Biological Interest, Université Des Frères Mentouri-Constantine 1, Constantine, Algeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7727-8583

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we report the first antibacterial evaluation of a focused library of 12 previously synthesized α-sulfamidophosphonate derivatives (4a-4l) against a panel of nine Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains, including ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales. The overall hit rate was modest, as most compounds were inactive at the highest tested concentration (MIC ≥ 256 µg/mL), indicating a narrow and strain-selective profile. Nevertheless, selected derivatives showed noteworthy activity against individual isolates: 4 g inhibited Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213 at 4 µg/mL, 4c inhibited KPC-3-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae at 2 µg/mL, and 4e and 4l inhibited VIM-producing Escherichia coli at 4 µg/mL. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were used to examine substituent-dependent electronic features, whereas docking and 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were employed to test whether the scaffold can adopt plausible binding modes in a dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) model. Because no biochemical DHPS assay was performed, the computational results should be regarded as hypothesis-generating rather than mechanistic proof. In silico ADMET predictions were used as an exploratory triage step and similarly await experimental validation. Overall, the present work identifies α-sulfamidophosphonates as preliminary antibacterial hits for further optimization, while emphasizing the need for broader microbiology, cytotoxicity, bactericidal, and target-validation studies.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDihydropteroate SynthaseOrganophosphonatesDensity Functional TheoryGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular StructureStructure-Activity RelationshipAnti-Bacterial AgentsDihydropteroate SynthaseOrganophosphonatesADMETantibacterial activityDFT calculationsdihydropteroate synthaseMICmolecular dockingmolecular dynamicsα‐sulfamidophosphonates

Identifiers

PMID42555957
PMCPMC13441369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.