Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42555907›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2026

Distinct Patterns of Syntactic Errors Doubly Dissociate in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia.

Jeremy D Yeaton, Danielle Fahey, Michelle Gomez, Brielle C Stark, Julius Fridriksson, Dirk B den Ouden, Gregory Hickok, William Matchin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeremy D YeatonUniversity of California, Irvine.ORCID 0000-0002-6650-8080
Danielle FaheyUniversity of Alabama.
Michelle GomezUniversity of California, San Diego.
Brielle C StarkIndiana University Bloomington.
Julius FridrikssonUniversity of South Carolina.
Dirk B den OudenChapman University.
Gregory HickokUniversity of California, Irvine.
William MatchinUniversity of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-2530-8429

Funding

Arnold School of Public Health, University of South CarolinaNIDCD NIH HHS DC014664University of California Irvine SURF FellowshipWilliam Orr Dingwall Foundation Dissertation Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lesion correlates of syntactic deficits in aphasia remain poorly understood. Previous studies have suggested that distinct error types in expressive syntax may be associated with damage to different brain regions, but the specific lesion correlates of these errors have not been fully delineated. To address this gap, we analyzed spontaneous speech samples from individuals with chronic aphasia, categorizing errors into hierarchical (paragrammatic-like) and linearization (agrammatic-like) errors. Lesion-symptom mapping was conducted to identify brain regions associated with these error types. Lesion clusters in the medial superior temporal sulcus and inferior parietal lobe were associated with hierarchical errors, whereas frontal lesions, including those in the inferior and middle frontal lobe, were associated with linearization errors. These results provide support for a two-stage model of syntactic encoding, with distinct neural correlates for hierarchical and linearization processes. Our findings suggest that distinct brain regions contribute to different stages of syntactic encoding. Hierarchical processing seems to be supported by posterior temporal-parietal regions, whereas linearization seems to be supported by frontal regions. These results suggest that the diagnosis and treatment of aphasia could take into account the existence of distinct syntactic production deficits resulting from different patterns of brain damage.

Indexed as

AphasiaStrokeAgedBrain MappingChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID42555907
PMCPMC13668490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.