SynthesisThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Health risks of arsenic and chromium in groundwater and surface water in India: A systematic review.
Synthesis in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives India ranks third in global cancer incidence. Groundwater often carries undetectable contaminants such as arsenic, a highly toxic element, and chromium, a probable carcinogen. This systematic review aims to identify patterns of arsenic and chromium exposure in Indian population through groundwater and surface water, and the resulting health effects, including cancer and other non-communicable diseases. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for English-language studies from inception to January 8, 2025. Studies assessing health effects of arsenic or chromium in groundwater or surface were included. After screening the articles, data on key health risk indices: hazard quotient (HQ) and carcinogenic risk, were extracted and categorised by standard thresholds. Heat maps and violin plots were used to represent health risk levels across studies and regions. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool was used for quality assessment. Results A total of 1259 articles were identified, with 63 included studies. All reported studies presented a low risk of bias. Arsenic ingestion indicated non-carcinogenic risks in 49% of adult and 60% of child-focused studies. Chromium ingestion risks were lower, reported in 12% and 14% of adult and children-focused studies, respectively. Carcinogenic risk was higher for both metals, particularly through ingestion. Higher non-carcinogenic risk was reported from groundwater than surface water, especially via dermal exposure in children. Affected regions were Punjab, West Bengal, Haryana, Delhi, Uttarakhand, and Jammu and Kashmir. Interpretation and conclusions Groundwater arsenic contamination poses a major public health threat in India, while evidence on chromium ingestion risks are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.