ReviewPLOS global public health2026
Popular health surveillance in the face of climate emergencies.
Review in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Public health emergencies associated with extreme weather events - such as floods and droughts - have intensified, revealing the complex relationship between climate emergencies and structural inequalities. In Brazil, rural populations, riverine and forest communities, Indigenous peoples and those living in urban peripheries are disproportionately exposed to the impacts of climate emergencies, which exacerbate socio-environmental vulnerabilities. To protect populations, community-driven initiatives known as "Popular Health Surveillance" (PHS) have emerged and gained political relevance. PHS integrates popular knowledge, scientific understanding, and perspectives from health systems. Anchored in the principles of Popular Education in Health, the ecology of knowledge, and the Social Determination of Health and Good Living (Bien Vivir), PHS recognizes, values, and combines scientific knowledge, popular knowledge, and territorial experiences, promoting intercultural dialogue as a core methodological approach. In the context of climate emergencies, a major challenge for health systems is the implementation of effective mitigation, prevention, and resilience strategies - efforts that require coordination and collaboration among multiple actors and meaningful participation of populations in higher-risk areas. This article presents a conceptual framework and approaches for implementing Popular Health Surveillance in the context of climate emergencies. A documentary study identified national and international experiences of participatory health surveillance and examined them in dialogue with the PHS proposal. These experiences were analyzed based on their definitions and main operational strategies. PHS was further examined through its theoretical principles, strategies, attributes, and application in the face of climate emergencies. PHS is not only a participatory monitoring tool, but a strategy for promoting socio-environmental, cognitive, and health justice. In the context of intensifying climate crises, this approach is essential strengthening community adaptive capacity, integrating diverse knowledge systems, and demanding more inclusive and democratic public policies from an emancipatory perspective.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.