ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluating the psychosocial effects of the Northern Territory Institute of Sport (NTIS) High Performance Officiating Program (HPOP).
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of the 2021 Northern Territory Institute of Sport (NTIS) High Performance Officiating Program (HPOP) on five officials. The HPOP is designed to develop and support officials to aspire to and achieve high-level and international standards of officiating [1] through specialised training, mentorship, and resources to enhance their skills and performance in high-level officiating. At pre- and post-program, data were collected from each official and their mentor pertaining to official self-efficacy and resilience. Data were also collected on challenge and threat appraisals, physical and mental preparation, locus of control, and functional assertiveness subscales. Officials and mentors were also asked qualitative questions on resilience and self-efficacy. Visual analyses of graphed data, Reliable Change Indices (RCIs), and social validation data indicated reliable improvements in self-efficacy and resilience for three of the five officials. Changes were also observed in self-efficacy subscales (game knowledge, decision-making, pressure, and communication) although patterns varied between officials. Similarly, challenge and threat appraisals, physical and mental preparation, locus of control, and functional assertiveness demonstrated individualised patterns of change. Qualitative findings provided further support for the program's positive influence on self-efficacy and resilience. This research contributes valuable insights into the transformative effects of the NTIS High Performance Officiating Program on officials, emphasising notable improvements in self-efficacy and resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.