Observational studyPloS one2026
Machine learning-based prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting after spinal anesthesia: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent and serious complication after surgery. PONV also reduces patient satisfaction with surgery under spinal anesthesia and increases medical costs due to prolonged hospitalization. The purpose of this study is to apply artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning analysis to identify risk factors for PONV in patients undergoing surgery with spinal anesthesia. This retrospective study used artificial intelligence to analyze data of adult patients (aged ≥20 years) who underwent surgery under spinal anesthesia at Tohoku University Hospital from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2022. To evaluate PONV, patients who experienced nausea and/or vomiting or used antiemetics within 24 hours after surgery were extracted from postoperative medical records. The selected data were analyzed after propensity score matching with patients who did not experience PONV. We created an ensemble model for predicting the probability of PONV using five machine learning algorithms: random forest, gradient boosting machine, k-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, and decision tree. Data were available for 4,574 patients. We performed propensity score matching and selected 538 patients for analysis (269 in the PONV group and 269 in the non-PONV group). The use of postoperative fentanyl was identified as the strongest contributor to PONV, followed by duration of surgery, body mass index (BMI), total urine output, and duration of anesthesia. The identified risk factors were female sex, BMI < 25 kg/m2, and duration of surgery (< 60 min), duration of anesthesia (< 100 min), cesarean section, use of postoperative fentanyl, administration of fentanyl/ morphine into the spinal arachnoid, and puncture level of epidural anesthesia (Th7-12) were identified as anesthesia/surgery-related risk factors. We used machine learning AI to evaluate risk factors for PONV after spinal anesthesia. We identified several patient-related and anesthesia/surgery-related risk factors for PONV. The AI analysis used in this study was accurate enough to identify risk factors for PONV during spinal anesthesia and may provide sufficient evidence for predicting PONV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.