SynthesisPloS one2026
Harms of massage in persons with cancer or receiving treatment for cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMassage is widely used in cancer survivors. However, formal assessment of potential harms is lacking. The aim of this study is to assess harms related to massage. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis included studies that compared massage with control conditions, in people with- and/or receiving treatment for cancer. The primary outcome was adverse events. Ten databases and trials registries were searched up to 22 October 2024. Quality of adverse events reporting was assessed as adherence to the CONSORT statement extension for reporting of harms. Studies reporting on adverse events were assessed for risk of bias using the PEDro scale (randomized controlled/ cross-over trials) and ROBINS-I (quasi-experimental and cohort) and were eligible for meta-analysis (random-effect). The study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023352993).
resultsSixty-three intervention studies were included, of which 53% (n = 34 studies) did not report on adverse events. Twenty-nine studies (n = 2699) reported on adverse events explicity and/or as study discontinuation. Of these, no studies assessed deep massage, with most interventions using light massage. Meta-analyses indicated no evidence of a higher risk of adverse events related to massage compared to usual care/attention control. Three cohort studies (n = 1406) were included, two of which (both with critical risk of bias) found significant associations between massage over tumor site and negative survival outcomes, in patients with osteosarcoma. Overall, the quality of adverse events reporting was poor, and certainty of evidence considered very low.
conclusionResults indicate that light to moderate intensity massage in people living with- and/or receiving treatment for cancer can be performed without increased risk of harms. Contraindications for massage should be applied as per the general population. Due to uncertainty as to whether massage over tumor in osteosarcoma constitutes an increased risk of negative survival outcomes, massage directly on tumor is discouraged, though definitive evidence is lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.