Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42555580›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Untargeted metabolomics as a new perspective for assessing taxonomic boundaries in alpine Rubus genus.

Emiliano Serviole, Antoine Henriot, Christiane Gallet, Coralie Audoin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emiliano ServioleGrenoble Alpes University, Savoie Mont Blanc University, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Grenoble, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4450-9523
Antoine HenriotAsters, Conservatoire d'espaces naturels de Haute-Savoie, Annecy, France.
Christiane GalletGrenoble Alpes University, Savoie Mont Blanc University, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Grenoble, France.
Coralie AudoinLaboratoires Clarins, Pontoise, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of a robust taxonomy for the genus Rubus remains a real challenge, due to apomictic reproduction and hybridization that led to a very large number of "taxa" with undefined frontiers. Using an untargeted metabolomic approach and a two-year leaf sampling along an elevational gradient in the French Alps we provide new tools to assess boundaries between nine Rubus taxa. Multivariate analyses on ionic intensity matrices (of 566 and 668 features for 2023 and 2024 sampling respectively) have shown that R. idaeus species, the two sections Corylifolii and Rubus, and Caesii section related taxa, formed three distinct super groups. Thirty-eight compounds have been annotated, including 8 detected in genus Rubus for the first time. Discriminant compounds have been annotated, allowing to propose ursane triterpenoids, flavonoids glycosides, lignans and gallotannins as taxonomic classifiers of the genus Rubus. Among those, quercetin - and kaempferol - 3-O-methylglutaryl hexoside were detected at higher levels in R. idaeus, whereas neolignans glycosides have been mostly detected in sections Corylifolii and Rubus. The intermediate position of Caesii between the two others did not allow to propose specific biomarkers of the section. The need for a precise and detailed description of the phytochemical profiles of the various Rubus subgroups is reinforced by the growing use of some of these compounds in pharmacology and cosmetics.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsRubusFlavonoidsMetabolomePlant LeavesFlavonoids

Identifiers

PMID42555580
PMCPMC13440846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.