Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42555476›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Case report and literature analysis on individualized hysteroscopic management of complex Müllerian anomalies complicated by bilateral adenomyosis.

Hui Liao, Rena, Shu-Han Wang, Niang-Hai Peng, Yan Ke, Xiao-Lei Song

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui LiaoShenzhen Clinical College of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
RenaGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shu-Han WangGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Niang-Hai PengGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yan KeGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao-Lei SongGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and individualized hysteroscopic conservative treatment strategies for a case of uterine didelphys with a single vagina complicated by bilateral adenomyosis, adenomyoma, and endometrial polyps. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of a reproductive-aged female patient admitted to Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine. The patient's medical history, imaging features, surgical approach, and follow-up outcomes were systematically reviewed and analyzed in conjunction with relevant literature. Results: The patient presented with progressively worsening dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. Imaging revealed uterine didelphys (single vaginal type) with bilateral diffuse adenomyosis and adenomyoma, accompanied by endometrial polyps. Hysteroscopic polypectomy was performed. Based on the morphology of both uterine cavities and the characteristics of the lesions, a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was suture-fixed hysteroscopically in the right uterine cavity, while a GyneFix Conclusion: Hysteroscopic individualized selection and suture fixation of intrauterine devices can serve as an effective uterus-preserving treatment option for patients with complex uterine anomalies complicated by adenomyosis.

Indexed as

adenomyosishysteroscopylevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systemsuture fixation techniqueuterus didelphys with single vagina

Identifiers

PMID42555476
PMCPMC13393009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.